amber-spec-experts  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: The Record Attribute - What does it mean to be a record at runtime? Chris Hegarty
  • Re: The Record Attribute - What does it mean to be a record at runtime? Dan Smith
  • Re: The Record Attribute - What does it mean to be a record at runtime? Brian Goetz
  • Re: The Record Attribute - What does it mean to be a record at runtime? Roman Elizarov
• [sealed] @SafeVarargs on the methods of sealed class/interface Tagir Valeev
  • Re: [sealed] @SafeVarargs on the methods of sealed class/interface Remi Forax
  • Re: [sealed] @SafeVarargs on the methods of sealed class/interface Brian Goetz
• Bad iteraction between the compact constructor and parameters captured by a lambda Remi Forax
  • Re: Bad iteraction between the compact constructor and parameters captured by a lambda Remi Forax
  • Re: Bad iteraction between the compact constructor and parameters captured by a lambda Brian Goetz
  • Re: Bad iteraction between the compact constructor and parameters captured by a lambda forax
• [sealed-classes] Spec for next version of Sealed Classes Gavin Bierman
  • Re: [sealed-classes] Spec for next version of Sealed Classes Remi Forax
  • Re: [sealed-classes] Spec for next version of Sealed Classes Chris Hegarty
  • Re: [sealed-classes] Spec for next version of Sealed Classes Dan Smith
  • Re: [sealed-classes] Spec for next version of Sealed Classes Chris Hegarty
  • Re: [sealed-classes] Spec for next version of Sealed Classes Dan Smith
  • Re: [sealed-classes] Spec for next version of Sealed Classes Gavin Bierman
  • Re: [sealed-classes] Spec for next version of Sealed Classes Brian Goetz
• [sealed] JDK-8243582: JVMS change to class loading error Dan Smith
• Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Remi Forax
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Remi Forax
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Remi Forax
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types forax
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Remi Forax
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Dan Heidinga
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types John Rose
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Remi Forax
  • Re: [External] : Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Brian Goetz
  • Re: [External] : Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types forax
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Remi Forax
  • Re: [External] : Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Relaxed assignment conversions for sealed types Brian Goetz
• instanceof and exceptions Remi Forax
  • Re: instanceof and exceptions Gavin Bierman
  • Re: instanceof and exceptions Brian Goetz
  • Re: instanceof and exceptions Tagir Valeev
  • Re: instanceof and exceptions forax
• [patterns-instanceof] Spec for next version of Patterns in instanceof JEP Gavin Bierman
  • Re: [patterns-instanceof] Spec for next version of Patterns in instanceof JEP Brian Goetz
  • Re: [patterns-instanceof] Spec for next version of Patterns in instanceof JEP Gavin Bierman
  • Re: [patterns-instanceof] Spec for next version of Patterns in instanceof JEP Gavin Bierman
  • Re: [patterns-instanceof] Spec for next version of Patterns in instanceof JEP Gavin Bierman
  • Re: [patterns-instanceof] Spec for next version of Patterns in instanceof JEP Brian Goetz
  • Re: [patterns-instanceof] Spec for next version of Patterns in instanceof JEP Remi Forax
• Fwd: Records feedback Brian Goetz
  • Re: Records feedback Remi Forax
• [records] Spec for next version of Record Classes JEP Gavin Bierman
  • Re: [records] Spec for next version of Record Classes JEP Tagir Valeev
  • Re: [records] Spec for next version of Record Classes JEP Gavin Bierman
  • Re: [records] Spec for next version of Record Classes JEP Brian Goetz
  • Re: [records] Spec for next version of Record Classes JEP Gavin Bierman
  • Re: [records] Spec for next version of Record Classes JEP Brian Goetz
  • Re: [records] Spec for next version of Record Classes JEP Tagir Valeev
  • Re: [records] Spec for next version of Record Classes JEP Gavin Bierman
  • Re: [records] Spec for next version of Record Classes JEP Gavin Bierman
  • Re: [records] Spec for next version of Record Classes JEP Tagir Valeev
  • Re: [records] Spec for next version of Record Classes JEP Remi Forax
  • Re: [records] Spec for next version of Record Classes JEP forax
• Re: What does "total" really mean? Brian Goetz
  • Re: What does "total" really mean? Brian Goetz
• Updated patterns-in-switch doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: Updated patterns-in-switch doc Remi Forax
  • Re: Updated patterns-in-switch doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: Updated patterns-in-switch doc Remi Forax
  • Re: Updated patterns-in-switch doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: Updated patterns-in-switch doc forax
  • Re: Updated patterns-in-switch doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: Updated patterns-in-switch doc forax
  • Re: Updated patterns-in-switch doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: Updated patterns-in-switch doc Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Updated patterns-in-switch doc Brian Goetz
• Is case var(var x, var y) a valid syntax ? Remi Forax
  • Re: Is case var(var x, var y) a valid syntax ? Alan Malloy
  • Re: Is case var(var x, var y) a valid syntax ? Guy Steele
  • Re: Is case var(var x, var y) a valid syntax ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Is case var(var x, var y) a valid syntax ? forax
  • Re: Is case var(var x, var y) a valid syntax ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Is case var(var x, var y) a valid syntax ? forax
  • Re: Is case var(var x, var y) a valid syntax ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Is case var(var x, var y) a valid syntax ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Is case var(var x, var y) a valid syntax ? forax
  • Re: Is case var(var x, var y) a valid syntax ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Is case var(var x, var y) a valid syntax ? forax
  • Re: Is case var(var x, var y) a valid syntax ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Is case var(var x, var y) a valid syntax ? forax
  • Re: Is case var(var x, var y) a valid syntax ? Brian Goetz
• When several patterns are total ? Remi Forax
  • Re: When several patterns are total ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: When several patterns are total ? Tagir Valeev
  • Re: When several patterns are total ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: When several patterns are total ? forax
  • Re: When several patterns are total ? forax
• Opting into totality Brian Goetz
  • Re: Opting into totality Guy Steele
  • Re: Opting into totality Brian Goetz
  • Re: Opting into totality Guy Steele
  • Re: Opting into totality Guy Steele
  • Re: Opting into totality Brian Goetz
  • Re: Opting into totality Guy Steele
  • Re: Opting into totality Guy Steele
  • Re: Opting into totality Guy Steele
  • Re: Opting into totality Brian Goetz
  • Re: Opting into totality Guy Steele
  • Re: Opting into totality Brian Goetz
  • Re: Opting into totality Guy Steele
  • Re: Opting into totality Brian Goetz
  • Re: Opting into totality Guy Steele
  • Re: Opting into totality Brian Goetz
• Optimistic totality Brian Goetz
  • Re: Optimistic totality Remi Forax
• switch: using an expicit type as total is dangerous Remi Forax
  • Re: switch: using an expicit type as total is dangerous Brian Goetz
  • Re: switch: using an expicit type as total is dangerous forax
  • Re: switch: using an expicit type as total is dangerous Brian Goetz
  • Re: switch: using an expicit type as total is dangerous Brian Goetz
  • Re: switch: using an expicit type as total is dangerous forax
  • Re: switch: using an expicit type as total is dangerous forax
  • Re: switch: using an expicit type as total is dangerous Dan Smith
  • Re: switch: using an expicit type as total is dangerous forax
  • Re: switch: using an expicit type as total is dangerous Brian Goetz
• switch on Class ? Remi Forax
  • Re: switch on Class ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: switch on Class ? forax
  • Re: switch on Class ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: switch on Class ? Tagir Valeev
• Sealed local interfaces Remi Forax
  • Re: Sealed local interfaces Vicente Romero
  • Re: Sealed local interfaces Brian Goetz
  • Re: Sealed local interfaces Remi Forax
  • Re: Sealed local interfaces Dan Smith
• [pattern-switch] Is totality too subtle? Brian Goetz
• [pattern-switch] Guards Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Guards Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Guards Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Guards Guy Steele
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Guards Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Guards Guy Steele
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Guards Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Guards Guy Steele
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Guards Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Guards Guy Steele
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Guards Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Guards Brian Goetz
• [pattern-switch] Exhaustiveness Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Exhaustiveness Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Exhaustiveness Tagir Valeev
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Exhaustiveness Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Exhaustiveness Remi Forax
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Exhaustiveness Guy Steele
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Exhaustiveness Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Exhaustiveness Guy Steele
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Exhaustiveness Brian Goetz
  • [pattern-switch] Totality Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Guy Steele
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality forax
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Guy Steele
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Guy Steele
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Guy Steele
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Guy Steele
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Guy Steele
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Remi Forax
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality forax
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality forax
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Remi Forax
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality forax
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Guy Steele
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality forax
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Remi Forax
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality Brian Goetz
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality forax
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Totality forax
  • Re: [pattern-switch] Exhaustiveness forax
  • Letting the nulls flow (Was: Exhaustiveness) Brian Goetz
  • Re: Letting the nulls flow (Was: Exhaustiveness) Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Letting the nulls flow (Was: Exhaustiveness) Brian Goetz
  • Re: Letting the nulls flow (Was: Exhaustiveness) forax

• Earlier messages
• Later messages