amber-spec-experts  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [External] : Pattern assignment statements (extracted from: Primitive type patterns and conversions) Brian Goetz
  • Re: [External] : Pattern assignment statements (extracted from: Primitive type patterns and conversions) John Rose
  • Re: [External] : Pattern assignment statements (extracted from: Primitive type patterns and conversions) forax
  • Re: [External] : Pattern assignment statements (extracted from: Primitive type patterns and conversions) John Rose
  • Re: [External] : Pattern assignment statements (extracted from: Primitive type patterns and conversions) Gavin Bierman
  • Re: Primitive type patterns and conversions John Rose
• Deserialization of a linked list of records Remi Forax
  • Re: Deserialization of a linked list of records Chris Hegarty
  • Re: Deserialization of a linked list of records Chris Hegarty
  • Re: Deserialization of a linked list of records forax
• Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Gavin Bierman
  • Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Tagir Valeev
  • Re: [External] : Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Gavin Bierman
  • Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Brian Goetz
  • Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Remi Forax
  • Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Brian Goetz
  • Re: [External] : Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Gavin Bierman
  • Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Remi Forax
  • Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Brian Goetz
  • Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs forax
  • Re: [External] : Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Brian Goetz
  • Re: [External] : Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs John Rose
  • Re: [External] : Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Brian Goetz
  • Re: [External] : Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs forax
  • Re: [External] : Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Gavin Bierman
  • Re: [External] : Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs forax
  • Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Guy Steele
  • Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Brian Goetz
  • Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs John Rose
  • Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs forax
  • Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs forax
  • Re: [External] : Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Guy Steele
  • Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs John Rose
  • Re: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Brian Goetz
  • Fwd: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Brian Goetz
  • Re: Fwd: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Brian Goetz
  • Re: Fwd: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Alan Malloy
  • Re: [External] : Re: Fwd: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Brian Goetz
  • Re: [External] : Re: Fwd: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs Brian Goetz
  • Re: [External] : Re: Fwd: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs John Rose
  • Re: [External] : Re: Fwd: Two new draft pattern matching JEPs John Rose
• Pattern Matching in Python Remi Forax
  • Re: Pattern Matching in Python Brian Goetz
  • Re: Pattern Matching in Python Gavin Bierman
• Semantics of multiple patterns with the same prefix in a switch Remi Forax
  • Re: Semantics of multiple patterns with the same prefix in a switch Brian Goetz
  • Re: Semantics of multiple patterns with the same prefix in a switch Guy Steele
  • Re: Semantics of multiple patterns with the same prefix in a switch forax
  • Re: [External] : Re: Semantics of multiple patterns with the same prefix in a switch Brian Goetz
  • Re: [External] : Re: Semantics of multiple patterns with the same prefix in a switch Guy Steele
  • Re: [External] : Re: Semantics of multiple patterns with the same prefix in a switch Brian Goetz
  • Re: [External] : Re: Semantics of multiple patterns with the same prefix in a switch forax
  • Re: [External] : Re: Semantics of multiple patterns with the same prefix in a switch Guy Steele
  • Re: [External] : Re: Semantics of multiple patterns with the same prefix in a switch forax
  • Re: Semantics of multiple patterns with the same prefix in a switch Brian Goetz
• Instance pattern vs functional interface Remi Forax
  • Re: Instance pattern vs functional interface Brian Goetz
• [sealed] Use 'open' instead of 'non-sealed'? Tagir Valeev
  • Re: [sealed] Use 'open' instead of 'non-sealed'? Remi Forax
  • Re: [sealed] Use 'open' instead of 'non-sealed'? Brian Goetz
• Can pattern methods be total ? Remi Forax
  • Re: Can pattern methods be total ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Can pattern methods be total ? forax
  • Re: [External] : Re: Can pattern methods be total ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: [External] : Re: Can pattern methods be total ? forax
  • Re: Can pattern methods be total ? Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Can pattern methods be total ? forax
• Patterns: declaration Brian Goetz
  • Re: Patterns: declaration Tagir Valeev
  • Re: [External] : Re: Patterns: declaration Brian Goetz
  • Re: [External] : Re: Patterns: declaration Brian Goetz
  • Re: Patterns: declaration Guy Steele
  • Re: Patterns: declaration Brian Goetz
  • Re: Patterns: declaration Remi Forax
  • Re: Patterns: declaration Guy Steele
• Pattern features for next iteration Brian Goetz
  • Re: Pattern features for next iteration Remi Forax
  • Re: [External] : Re: Pattern features for next iteration Brian Goetz
  • Re: [External] : Re: Pattern features for next iteration forax
  • Nullity (was: Pattern features for next iteration) Brian Goetz
  • Re: Nullity (was: Pattern features for next iteration) Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Nullity (was: Pattern features for next iteration) Brian Goetz
  • Re: Nullity (was: Pattern features for next iteration) Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Nullity (was: Pattern features for next iteration) Remi Forax
  • Re: [External] : Re: Nullity (was: Pattern features for next iteration) Brian Goetz
  • Re: [External] : Re: Nullity (was: Pattern features for next iteration) forax
  • Re: Nullity (was: Pattern features for next iteration) Tagir Valeev
  • Re: [External] : Re: Nullity (was: Pattern features for next iteration) Brian Goetz
  • Re: [External] : Re: Nullity (was: Pattern features for next iteration) Remi Forax
  • Re: [External] : Re: Nullity (was: Pattern features for next iteration) Brian Goetz
• Patterns and arguments Remi Forax
  • Re: Patterns and arguments Brian Goetz
• The good and the bad static pattern ? Remi Forax
  • Re: The good and the bad static pattern ? Tagir Valeev
  • Re: The good and the bad static pattern ? Remi Forax
  • Re: The good and the bad static pattern ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: The good and the bad static pattern ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: The good and the bad static pattern ? forax
  • Re: [External] : Re: The good and the bad static pattern ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: [External] : Re: The good and the bad static pattern ? forax
  • Re: [External] : Re: The good and the bad static pattern ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: [External] : Re: The good and the bad static pattern ? forax
  • Re: [External] : Re: The good and the bad static pattern ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: [External] : Re: The good and the bad static pattern ? Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [External] : Re: The good and the bad static pattern ? forax
• Patterns vs guards Remi Forax
  • Re: Patterns vs guards Brian Goetz
  • Re: Patterns vs guards Guy Steele
  • Re: Patterns vs guards Gavin Bierman
• [records] C-style array declaration of record components - sec 10.2 clarification Manoj Palat
  • Re: [records] C-style array declaration of record components - sec 10.2 clarification Gavin Bierman
  • RE: [records] C-style array declaration of record components - sec 10.2 clarification Manoj Palat
• New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Remi Forax
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: New pattern matching doc forax
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Remi Forax
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: New pattern matching doc forax
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: New pattern matching doc forax
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: New pattern matching doc forax
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: New pattern matching doc forax
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: New pattern matching doc forax
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: New pattern matching doc forax
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: New pattern matching doc forax
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Remi Forax
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Mark Raynsford
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Mark Raynsford
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Elias N Vasylenko
  • Re: New pattern matching doc Brian Goetz
• Array patterns (and varargs patterns) Brian Goetz
  • Re: Array patterns (and varargs patterns) Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Array patterns (and varargs patterns) Brian Goetz
• Accessibility of classes nested in local classes Dan Smith
  • Re: Accessibility of classes nested in local classes Brian Goetz
  • Re: Accessibility of classes nested in local classes Dan Smith
• Diamond in type patterns? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Diamond in type patterns? Remi Forax
  • Re: Diamond in type patterns? forax
  • Re: Diamond in type patterns? Remi Forax
  • Re: Diamond in type patterns? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Diamond in type patterns? forax
  • Re: Diamond in type patterns? Remi Forax
• Unexpected compilation error with generic sealed interface Mark Raynsford
  • Re: Unexpected compilation error with generic sealed interface Remi Forax
  • Re: Unexpected compilation error with generic sealed interface Mark Raynsford
  • Re: Unexpected compilation error with generic sealed interface Vicente Romero
  • Re: Unexpected compilation error with generic sealed interface Mark Raynsford
  • Re: Unexpected compilation error with generic sealed interface Vicente Romero
• Specs update Gavin Bierman
  • Re: Specs update Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Specs update Gavin Bierman
• Fwd: Should final fields in records be trusted or not trusted in 16? Remi Forax
  • Re: Should final fields in records be trusted or not trusted in 16? Chris Hegarty
  • Re: Should final fields in records be trusted or not trusted in 16? Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Should final fields in records be trusted or not trusted in 16? forax
  • Re: Should final fields in records be trusted or not trusted in 16? Chris Hegarty
  • Re: Should final fields in records be trusted or not trusted in 16? forax
  • Re: Should final fields in records be trusted or not trusted in 16? John Rose
  • Re: Should final fields in records be trusted or not trusted in 16? John Rose
  • Re: Should final fields in records be trusted or not trusted in 16? Mandy Chung
  • Re: Should final fields in records be trusted or not trusted in 16? Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Should final fields in records be trusted or not trusted in 16? Brian Goetz
• [statics] allowing static initializers in interfaces? Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [statics] allowing static initializers in interfaces? Brian Goetz
  • Re: [statics] allowing static initializers in interfaces? Remi Forax
  • Re: [statics] allowing static initializers in interfaces? John Rose
  • Re: [statics] allowing static initializers in interfaces? Remi Forax
  • Re: [statics] allowing static initializers in interfaces? John Rose
  • Re: [statics] allowing static initializers in interfaces? forax
• Re: Adding Do notaion/For comprehension Remi Forax
• The Record Attribute - What does it mean to be a record at runtime? Chris Hegarty
  • Re: The Record Attribute - What does it mean to be a record at runtime? Remi Forax
  • Re: The Record Attribute - What does it mean to be a record at runtime? Chris Hegarty
  • Re: The Record Attribute - What does it mean to be a record at runtime? forax
  • Re: The Record Attribute - What does it mean to be a record at runtime? Chris Hegarty
  • Re: The Record Attribute - What does it mean to be a record at runtime? forax
  • Re: The Record Attribute - What does it mean to be a record at runtime? Alex Buckley
  • Re: The Record Attribute - What does it mean to be a record at runtime? Remi Forax
  • Re: The Record Attribute - What does it mean to be a record at runtime? Dan Smith
  • Re: The Record Attribute - What does it mean to be a record at runtime? Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: The Record Attribute - What does it mean to be a record at runtime? forax
  • Re: The Record Attribute - What does it mean to be a record at runtime? Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: The Record Attribute - What does it mean to be a record at runtime? forax

• Earlier messages
• Later messages