Let's run with it.
Anyone have strong views on the <ambit> netiquette? Is there a "rule" or two that we should get rid of? Or would you like to add a few more?
Comments very welcome (by me at least).
Chris
At 12:15 am +0000 6/2/03, Simon Yuill wrote:
These discussions, and our current theme, raise the issue of who should have the right to determine what guidelines the list operates by. If ambit is truly collaborative then surely the setting of guidelines should be open to ammendment by the list membership as a whole?If a significant number of people on the list feel that there is value in some of the messages which have gone against the netiquette, then perhaps it is the netiquette which should be altered rather than the behaviour of the list members? best wishes, Si. ------------------------------------------------- a m b i t : networking media arts in scotland post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] archive: http://www.mediascot.org/ambit info: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and write "info ambit" in the message body -------------------------------------------------
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Chris Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------
New Media Scotland tel: +44 131 477 3774 P.O. Box 23434, Edinburgh EH7 5SZ fax: +44 131 477 3775
Scotland, UK http://www.mediascot.org
--------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
a m b i t : networking media arts in scotland
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
archive: http://www.mediascot.org/ambit
info: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and write "info ambit" in the message body
-------------------------------------------------
