Again, we have a form of clever advertising, something the brits are quite good at. Political critique that gets paid; or is it just someone wanting to get paid who uses political critique as a hook?
It seems like another permutation of what Debord called "the integrated spectacle" and may even represent a new tactic--if not a new strategy--for commodifying dissent.
Chris
At 12:30 pm -0400 7/7/03, gair dunlop wrote:
the above being a definition of "ambit"
the idea of being "entrenched in cyberculture" takes on interesting connotations.
I wonder if it's worth thinking about who ambit people are?
who amongst us is embedded deeply in a network of different lists, boards, groups etc?
And if we are, what are the downsides of this: we think we're getting a diversity of viewpoints but they are a self re-inforcing circuit. If we get touchy about things being forwarded that "everybody knows/has seen already" then we're making a lot of assumptions about who "we" are and become a self-perpetuating elite...
> <...>Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 21:26:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Amy Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: <nettime> Google's Weapons of Mass Destruction
i understand how it can be annoying if the same joke arrives in one's inbox repeatedly, but i think we shouldn't overlook the power of a meme as a form of political resistance. i've received this one from people who don't usually seem to question the war; it seems to be hitting a nerve beyond the "preaching to the converted" crowd.
the meme is quickly moving beyond email circles into mainstream media - reuters et al are now reporting it... search now for weapons of mass destruction... http://news.google.com/news?q=weapons+of+mass+destruction
as to whether the redundant forwarding is a symptom of info- or cyber-dependency: the interesting thing is that each time someone forwards it, it means that the sender has just received the message for the first time - in most cases, the people who receive something like this repeatedly are cyber-veterans with large cyber-social-networks, whereas the senders are not very entrenched in cyberculture (otherwise, they'd realize it was redundant and not send it.)
so, whatever one's feelings on the dark humor, this seems to be something that a lot of people from outside the usual net-active and politically-active circles are hooking into. there's a lot of social discomfort in the states about anti-war discussions since one can be shunned by one's peers as a traitor. so memes and dark humor can be icebreakers for a lot of people to start discussing these issues, and that really needs to happen...
- -@
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Bill Spornitz wrote:
Co-Info-Dependents;
I have enjoyed the e-rhythm washing ashore as this little info-fluff has arrived in my inbox about twice a day since it first came out on metafilter, or slashdot, or al-jazeera, or whatever, about 6 days ago.
gair dunlop www.gairspace.org.uk Cumbernauld: Town for Tomorrow www.cumbernauld.nu
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Chris Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------
New Media Scotland tel: +44 131 477 3774 P.O. Box 23434, Edinburgh EH7 5SZ fax: +44 131 477 3775
Scotland, UK http://www.mediascot.org
--------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
a m b i t : networking media arts in scotland
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
archive: http://www.mediascot.org/ambit
info: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and write "info ambit" in the message body
-------------------------------------------------
