Title: An external boundary; a circuit.
the above being a definition of "ambit"
the idea of being "entrenched in cyberculture" takes on interesting connotations.
I wonder if it's worth thinking about who ambit people are?
who amongst us is embedded deeply in a network of different lists, boards, groups etc?
And if we are, what are the downsides of this: we think we're getting a diversity of viewpoints but they are a self re-inforcing circuit. If we get touchy about things being forwarded that "everybody knows/has seen already" then we're making a lot of assumptions about who "we" are and become a self-perpetuating elite...



>Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 21:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Amy Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: <nettime> Google's Weapons of Mass Destruction
>
>i understand how it can be annoying if the same joke arrives in one's
>inbox repeatedly, but i think we shouldn't overlook the power of a
>meme as a form of political resistance. i've received this one from
>people who don't usually seem to question the war; it seems to be
>hitting a nerve beyond the "preaching to the converted" crowd.
>
>the meme is quickly moving beyond email circles into mainstream media
>- reuters et al are now reporting it... search now for weapons of
>mass destruction...
>http://news.google.com/news?q=weapons+of+mass+destruction
>
>as to whether the redundant forwarding is a symptom of info- or
>cyber-dependency: the interesting thing is that each time someone
>forwards it, it means that the sender has just received the message
>for the first time - in most cases, the people who receive something
>like this repeatedly are cyber-veterans with large
>cyber-social-networks, whereas the senders are not very entrenched in
>cyberculture (otherwise, they'd realize it was redundant and not send
>it.)
>
>so, whatever one's feelings on the dark humor, this seems to be
>something that a lot of people from outside the usual net-active and
>politically-active circles are hooking into. there's a lot of social
>discomfort in the states about anti-war discussions since one can be
>shunned by one's peers as a traitor. so memes and dark humor can be
>icebreakers for a lot of people to start discussing these issues, and
>that really needs to happen...
>
>- -@
>
>
>On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Bill Spornitz wrote:
>
>> Co-Info-Dependents;
>>
>> I have enjoyed the e-rhythm washing ashore as this little info-fluff
>> has arrived in my inbox about twice a day since it first came out on
>> metafilter, or slashdot, or al-jazeera, or whatever, about 6 days ago.
> <...>

gair dunlop
www.gairspace.org.uk
Cumbernauld: Town for Tomorrow www.cumbernauld.nu

Reply via email to