On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 10:02:32 -0400 Vineeth Remanan Pillai <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Perhaps: call_trace_foo() ? > > > call_trace_foo has one collision with the tracepoint > sched_update_nr_running and a function > call_trace_sched_update_nr_running. I had considered this and later > moved to trace_invoke_foo() because of the collision. But I can rename > call_trace_sched_update_nr_running to something else if call_trace_foo > is the general consensus. OK, then lets go with: trace_call__foo() The double underscore should prevent any name collisions. Does anyone have an objections? -- Steve
