On 2026-03-17 12:00, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 10:02:32 -0400
Vineeth Remanan Pillai <[email protected]> wrote:
Perhaps: call_trace_foo() ?
call_trace_foo has one collision with the tracepoint
sched_update_nr_running and a function
call_trace_sched_update_nr_running. I had considered this and later
moved to trace_invoke_foo() because of the collision. But I can rename
call_trace_sched_update_nr_running to something else if call_trace_foo
is the general consensus.
OK, then lets go with: trace_call__foo()
The double underscore should prevent any name collisions.
Does anyone have an objections?
I'm OK with it.
Thanks!
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
