Am 11.04.2018 um 19:11 schrieb Robin Murphy:
Now that drm_prime_sg_to_page_addr_arrays() understands the case where
dma_map_sg() has coalesced segments and returns 0 < count < nents, we
can relax the check to only consider genuine failure.

That pattern is repeated in pretty much all drivers using TTM.

So you would need to fix all of them, but as I said I don't think that this approach is a good idea.

We essentially wanted to get rid of the dma_address array in the mid term and that change goes into the exactly opposite direction.

Regards,
Christian.


Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
index 205da3ff9cd0..f81e96a4242f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
@@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ static int amdgpu_ttm_tt_pin_userptr(struct ttm_tt *ttm)
r = -ENOMEM;
        nents = dma_map_sg(adev->dev, ttm->sg->sgl, ttm->sg->nents, direction);
-       if (nents != ttm->sg->nents)
+       if (nents == 0)
                goto release_sg;
drm_prime_sg_to_page_addr_arrays(ttm->sg, ttm->pages,

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to