[
http://jira.amdatu.org/jira/browse/AMDATU-315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12637#comment-12637
]
Bram de Kruijff commented on AMDATU-315:
----------------------------------------
It's correct that we do not use pax-Runner container. We use the native
container. AFAIK this should not affect the fact that we are using the JUnit
driver? Switching container should be a matter of removing native and adding
paxrunner from the classpath (pom dependency).
One drawback of paxrunner against native is that it is much slower and I do
have a feeling we had some compatibility issues last time we tried.
ref:
http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/paxexam/Configuration+Options#ConfigurationOptions-frameworks
> Support Equinox / Knopflerfish in integration
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMDATU-315
> URL: http://jira.amdatu.org/jira/browse/AMDATU-315
> Project: Amdatu
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Amdatu Testing - Integration
> Reporter: Bram de Kruijff
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Sprint 4
>
>
> In order to guard OSGi code compliance it woul dprobably be a good idea to
> support integration testing against equinox and/or knopflerfish. This is
> something we can easily configure in our Pax Exam framework. However we
> allready lost compliance to these framework resulting in test failures.
> TODO:
> * Checkout that/how PAX Exam works
> * Integrate with Bamboo (seperate plans?
> * Possible Amdatu compatibility issues
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
http://jira.amdatu.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
Amdatu-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.amdatu.org/mailman/listinfo/amdatu-developers
