Frankly for me these are John Ehlers typical arguments to use his MESA model in stead of FFT and has nothing to do with a discussion. The question for me still remains if there really is no way to get better results with FFT than the ones we have got ? If Fourier analysis is correct and it's possible to simulate whatever continues timeseries with a bunch of sinewaves and if MESA can give me the correct harmonics, it should also be possible to obtain the same results with a modified version of FFT. Question is how ?
Ton Sieverding. ----- Original Message ----- From: wavemechanic To: AmiBroker, User Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 1:27 AM Subject: Re: [amibroker] FFT There is a discussion of FFT use and problems on Ehlers MESA website: http://www.mesasoftware.com/fftcomparison.htm Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: Ara Kaloustian To: AB-Main Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 3:16 PM Subject: [amibroker] FFT I was playing with AB's FFT code that TJ provided... The cycles seem to shift relative to the data, based on how many data points are analyzed. This is of course expected. Question: Has anyone found a way to determine optimum number of data points to analyze, and then determine the relevance of the dominant cycle, or find any relevant cycles? Most of the time the dominant cycle seems to be the largest one available. Has anyone been able to use these cycles succesfully? Ara ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.17/732 - Release Date: 3/24/2007 4:36 PM
