Dingo --
There are many third party editors available which support structured languages very well (for example, TextPad, which I use). Are there any that already support the functionality of embedding and striping of include files? If not, maybe there should be.

On the same vane, are there any with built in 'prettify'? I appreciate TJ's effort in adding that feature to the AB Editor. However, I do not use it, because I don't like the particular results. For example, I do not like a space after a '(' nor before a ')', or a carriage return before the '{' in an if statement, and indent only two characters. Also, I don't take sugar in my coffee.
-- Keith

dingo wrote:
A small external script file could be written to both embed the include file and then strip it when you're finished with the debugging. d

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Herman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Re Idea #1: A new editor window would not display/highlight errors
    because the code is not in-line. The extra editor window is not
    really needed: I always have my Include files open in another tab
    so that I can edit them immediately without looking for them. You
    just edit them, and save them when done - very simple and effective.


    The most powerful debugging method for Include files is to include
    them back into the code. There are many errors that can only be
    detected that way - including some that AB might not look for. .
    To add a feature that expands/collapses the include is probably
    much easier to implement for TJ complex error tracking. Remember
    to that we can work with nested includes, being able to
    expand/collapse only what is needed is preferential to having many
    windows open up.


    Another outstanding related feature request - I don't remember
    when i made it, must be very long ago - is related to the above.
    It would allow you to highlight a section of code and then save it
    as an include file wherever you want. AB would, after saving,
    replace the highlighted code with the proper #include file in your
    code. This would be a real time saver.


    Best regards,

    herman




    Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 1:45:03 PM, you wrote:


    >

        

    Herman,


    I went to vote for your idea, but I see that it was rejected and
    closed.  However, the INTENT of the idea is a VERY GOOD one.
     Perhaps we just need to simplify what is being requested and
    define it better so that it will get 90% of the benefit for 10% of
    the work by TJ.


    It would be great to be able to work with #include files from the
    start of the development, which is the direction I am moving
    towards.  To do that, we need to be able to highlight both editor
    code checks and runtime errors.


    The editor already checks the syntax of the formulas with all the
    included files and will highlight the #include statement of the
    file that contains the error.


    IDEA #1  How about Shift-Right Click in the #include line would
    give a contextual menu option to open the include file in a new
    editor window?  That gives quick access to displaying the AFL
    inside the include.  Editing and saving the file is just a normal
    editor window operation.  Opening the file could be a manual
    operation, but with a lot of include files, this could be a
    hassle.  This could be a stand alone suggestion in its own right.


    Then the next and more important thing we need is to be able to
highlight an error in the include file editor window.

    IDEA #2  Use the col number in the error line of the main formula
    to index into the open window of the include file.   Also display
    the error at the bottom of the editor window just like the AFL
    check does now, but the line and col numbers reindexed to the open
    window of the include file.  This can be a stand alone suggestion.


    I would even be willing to type in that col number by hand if it
    would get it implemented sooner, but doing something like right
    clicking on the error line to bring the include file to the front
and doing the #2 operation would be far superior.

    I believe that would bring include file debugging up to the same
    level as regular AFL code check in the editor window.


    The next step would be to bring the runtime errors up to the same
    level.  Once again, we have a line number to the #include
    statement, and a col number to the character position inside the
    file.  The obvious choice is to get the error transfered to the
    main formula editor window (which must be open of course), and
then it could be handled in the same way as above.

    IDEA #3  Right click on the error message in the runtime log
    window to transfer the information to an open editor window to
    operate as in idea #2.  This would not only help with included
    file debugging, but also with straight inline formula runtime
    debugging.  This is also a stand alone suggestion.


    So each of the three ideas brings a useful piece of convenience to
    debugging.  However, all three together make a complete package of
    debugging improvements.


    What do you think?


    BR,

    Dennis




    On Feb 10, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Herman wrote:



    Hi Dennis,,


    Debugging include files is never easy. I suggested once that when
    we right-click on "#include" a menu item would pop up that allows
    the user to expand/re-collapse the include file. This way errors
    are properly highlighted and other bugging techniques, and
    execution checks, can be applied. See my suggestion #764
    <http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/view_bug.php?bug_id=764> on the
    feedback center.


    Right now we have to do this manually - which, when the include
files are large, easily leads to copy/paste errors.

    best regards,

    herman



    Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 11:20:47 AM, you wrote:


    > Hello,


    > I have been reorganizing my trading system to a very modular approach

> using #include for each of the functional modules. My main program
    > has become a shell of the various included files.


    > When I click an on-chart button, I got a runtime error today that
    just

> flashed once and then was gone -- variable 'x' used without being > initialized at line 555 col 4843. I guessed it was part of a > ParamTrigger() like button click processing, since the program ran
    > after that.


> Line 555 points to an #include statement, but what is column 4843? > would that be the 4843 character of the file? The actual error > detected was in line 100 of the include file, so an average of 48
    > characters per line would be reasonable with the dense way I code
    AFL.


    > Is there a quick and easy way to locate the nth character of the file

    > within the Formula Editor for the next time an error inside an
    include

    > happens (and there will be many now)?


    > Best regards,

    > Dennis



    > ------------------------------------


    > **** IMPORTANT ****

    > This group is for the discussion between users only.

    > This is *NOT* technical support channel.


    > *********************

    > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT from AmiBroker please send an e-mail
    directly to

    > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com <http://amibroker.com/>

    > *********************


    > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:

    > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/ <http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/>


    > For other support material please check also:

    > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
    <http://www.amibroker.com/support.html>


    > *********************************

    > Yahoo! Groups Links


    >     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
    <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/>


    >     Individual Email | Traditional


    >     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
    <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join>

    >     (Yahoo! ID required)


    >     mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
    >     mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>


    >     [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>


    >     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>













Reply via email to