Angelo,

Some portfolio models can be implemented in AFL e.g. I have posted a basic 
template in the past that emulated the portfolio outcome (equity curve) for two 
simultaneous systems ... I did it in a chart pane.
It was very basic and accounted for closed trades only AND only allowed for one 
trade per symbol at a time AND assumed daily rebalancing.

I intended it as a starting point only ... I had no use for it at the time and 
so I stopped at the hard part.

(I don't know where it is now or what it was called). 

Maybe it wasn't all that clever from a programming point of view but it did 
prove the point that I set out to prove i.e. that simultaneous trades can be 
accounted for by their ave ROC or a weighting thereof )this is the key to the 
easiest form of AFL implmentation.

However, the point is .... whether or not it can be done depends on the model 
you are using, and the complexity of that model.... how many systems you want 
to trade and on how many symbols and whether you are in RT or daily bars etc.

I invited discussion on other models because some may more be suitable for AFL 
than others and also appeal to some users more than others e.g. some models 
don't neccesitate balancing the account as if in 'real life' and still give you 
the correct answer.

Of course, if you don't believe in the model then you won't believe in the code 
either.



--- In [email protected], "ang_60" <ima_c...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "vlanschot" <vlanschot@> wrote:
> >
> > Surprised that nobody seems to have suggested modern portfolio theory (MPT) 
> > in this context (I may have missed something.) 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi vlanshot,
> 
> I'm not surprised as this thread started asking how to program multisystem in 
> current AFL language, and especially how to match buy1, 2, ... N  with sell1, 
> 2, ...N
> 
> When - and only WHEN - I will be able to do it with Amibroker, I will start 
> to test if your mostly welcomed comments (and Brian's and Howard's and.... 
> all other) on MPT...Vince.. whatever ....could add value at what I'm already 
> thinking or not (I'd bet no, but this is really another thread's subject) 
> 
> Gretings,
> 
> Angelo.
>


Reply via email to