Hi Angelo I'm trouble posting to this thread, my previous post disappeared. You can definitely write an afl function that does most of the multiplexing of two or more systems. as to the question regarding two entries on the same bar. you can make one entry that is equivalent to two entries in terms of size and price on that bar ie size[i] = size1[i] + size2[i]; Buyprice[i] = (Buyprice1[i] * size1[i] + Buyprice2[i] * size2[i])/size[i]; I posted an example on the AB formula library http://www.amibroker.com/library/detail.php?id=1227 which should provide those who want to roll up their sleeves. It illustrates how you can group buys and sell signals together. You can change it to do what you want depending on your rules. Paul.
--- In [email protected], "ang_60" <ima_c...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "brian_z111" <brian_z111@> wrote: > > > > > > However, the point is .... whether or not it can be done depends on the > > model you are using, and the complexity of that model.... how many systems > > you want to trade and on how many symbols and whether you are in RT or > > daily bars etc. > > > > > Brian, > > sometimes a proper way to plan a new feature is to look at other who already > have travelled the same path: this way create a point of reference from which > we may discover we can do better orÂ…. simply transport their scheme into AB > (ideas have no copyright). > > I've already done this: although I like Amibroker the most, and I would like > it to became my one-stop software for everything I do in the trading world, I > know at least 4 retail products that allow built-in multisystem testing > (price varying from 410 usd$ to 3000 $), and I own three of them. > > So, I can honestly say that your point above is just your respectable point > of view but not at all an absolute necessity. > > In my humble opinion, the best possible multisystem testing engine is already > marketed, it is the one leaving the most flexibility to the user (for example > it allows to test both approach hicks was referring to: the "one cash pool" > and the "assign x% of equity to each system") and made absolutely no > reference to MPT, Vince or whatsoever. > > Greetings, > > Angelo >
