Thanks for the help. Will try this.

Wern

--- In [email protected], "bistrader" <bistra...@...> wrote:
>
> I believe you could also start with something like the following, with your 
> rsi code added, and do via regular bactest, plot or whatever.
> 
> function CountWatchList( listnum )
> {
> // retrive comma-separated list of symbols in watch list
> list = CategoryGetSymbols( categoryWatchlist, listnum );
> 
> Count = 0; // just in case there are no watch list members
> 
> for( i = 0; ( sym = StrExtract( list, i ) ) != ""; i++ )
> {
> Count = Count + 1;
> }
> return Count;
> }
> 
> Count = CountWatchList(10);
> //Filter = 1;
> //AddColumn(Count, "Count", 5.3);
> //Plot or whatever here
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "woodshedder_blogspot" 
> <woodshedder_blogspot@> wrote:
> >
> > Wern, I think this will work for you. You'll need to use the scan feature. 
> > It is also going to compute a universe count for you as well. You can of 
> > course tweak the universe parameters any way you like.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Wood
> > 
> > Buy = Sell = 0;
> > Universe = 0;
> > RSI2Count = 0;
> > AV10=MA(V,10);
> > RSI2=RSI(2);
> >  
> > // Scan and Count Universe
> > for (i=1; i<BarCount; i++)
> > {
> > if (C[i]>1 AND AV10[i]>100000)
> >   Universe[i] = Universe[i] + 1;
> > } 
> > AddToComposite (Universe, "~Universe", "X");
> > Plot ( Foreign("~Universe", "X"), "Universe",6,1);
> >  
> > // Scan and Count RSI2 > 90
> > for (i=1; i<BarCount; i++)
> > {
> > if (C[i]>1 AND AV10[i]>100000 AND RSI2>90)
> >   RSI2Count[i] = RSI2Count[i] + 1;
> > } 
> > AddToComposite (RSI2Count, "~RSI2Count", "X");
> > Plot ( Foreign("~RSI2Count", "X"), "RSI2Count",6,1);
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "wernkra" <WKRAG@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi there,
> > > 
> > > is there a way to count the number of stocks which are at a certain 
> > > RSI(2) threshold?
> > > I'd like to plot the number of stocks with RSI(2) > 90.
> > > 
> > > I guess that could be done with AddtoComposite.
> > > 
> > > How would I do that?
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > > 
> > > Wern
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to