Hello,

It is possible to get backfill data for all 3000 symbols one at a time.
It is doable now with current plugin.
Practice shows however that when you start to re-run such 3000 symbol 
exploration
periodically in fast succession your chances to get corrupted data grow 
because
of limitations discussed earlier.

Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com

On 2010-05-21 00:18, progster01 wrote:
> This raises a question in my mind wrt. Explorations -
>
> Suppose I want to determine the status ( 5m, 30 period %R for example ) of a 
> large list of stocks (e.g. Russell 3000), as of a moment in time (e.g. the 
> nearest past completed 5m bar at the time I ask the question).
>
> Is it inappropriate to hope that this should be possible based on having the 
> Exploration "wait for backfill" and get the backfill data for all 3000 
> symbols one-at-a-time, managing realtime subscription slots as necessary to 
> do it?
>
> IOW, a "snapshot" Exploration of a large list.
>
> Is this doable with AB today, or not?
>
> If not doable today, then would this scenario perhaps be reasonable for 
> possible future implementation, or not?
>
> (Gory details not required<g>  ...)
>
> - Progster
>
>
> --- In [email protected], Tomasz Janeczko<gro...@...>  wrote:
>
> (Partial quote)
>    
>> That is why it is required to keep data subscribed - you need to
>> build interval bars from data that are flowing in and to keep all
>> interval bars current you need to have RT data coming in.
>>      
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> This group is for the discussion between users only.
> This is *NOT* technical support channel.
>
> TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>
> TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
>
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>    

Reply via email to