Michael,

Again, interesting to hear your thoughts. I'd never thought about it to be 
honest.
However, I am option 2 unfortunately... i.e. I trade myself - pulling 
triggers... frankly there is no doubt some of my 'edge' or added value is my 
own ability as a trader... not just a system, although seeing the market in the 
correct way in a timely way is what I use AB for.
Certainly what you are saying makes sense... but I would need such a fast 
connection to myself and the server to make it work - faster than my current 
7Mbit DSL connection perhaps...??

Rob

--- In [email protected], "michaels_musings" <michaels_musi...@...> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "Rob" <sidhartha70@> wrote:
> >
> > But Mike, that would never be realistic for time critical real time usage 
> > such as day trading for example...? 
> 
> Hi Rob,
> 
> While my resultant question was regarding backtesting, for real time trading, 
> my thought would be, "Why not use a cloud?"
> 
> Install whatever software you need (IB, or whatever your brokerage platform 
> is, AB, etc.) onto the cloud and have the cloud be the one connecting to your 
> broker.
> 
> The connection between the cloud and your broker should be more stable and 
> less latent than the connection between where you are now and your broker 
> (Unless you trade from an AT&T data center?).
> 
> The question then becomes, a) are you babysitting your AB to see if it's 
> entering trades correctly?  Or b) are you the one pulling the trigger, based 
> upon AB recommendations?
> 
> a) works great, b) probably won't.
> 
> Best All,
> Michael
> 
> PS:  Mike, I understand your statements about licensing restrictions, but 
> until TJ makes AB multi-core usable they are mute.  Anyone who needs an 
> optimization to happen faster than 62 days (yes that is the actual number AB 
> said it would take for a four variable optimization on a database with ~45 
> stocks, ~100,000 ticks per stock) is going to ignore that clause.  Obviously 
> an Amazon cloud doesn't fulfill "not connected via network," but sorry, no 
> one cares.  At least until the software can get done what needs to be done in 
> a timely manner....
>


Reply via email to