It should have been: I understand what you mean by "I don't think that a plain old FIR (finite impulse response) can be proprietary", and I agree.
--- In [email protected], Mubashar Virk <mvir...@...> wrote: > > Shoot! It was late at night and English is my fourth language only. > The second line of my last reply does not read well. It should have been: > > I understand what you mean by "how plain old FIR (finite impulse > response) can be proprietary", and I agree. > > On 8/26/2010 6:05 AM, Tomasz Janeczko wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I could "package" bread and butter, and sell it. But I can not claim > > any intellectual rights to it. This is the point. > > > > This indicator is not different that say MA(16). It is well-known > > formula (yes simple moving average > > is also FIR filter!) plus arbitrarily selected parameter (16). > > Nothing more. > > > > There are many freeware IIR and FIR "design" programs (even on line > > like this: > > http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~fisher/mkfilter/ > > that allow you to enter cutoff frequency, passband ripple, etc > > and so on and the result is just the set of coefficients, and even > > C-source code ! so everybody can come up with zillions of > > such "inventions" in a matter of 5 seconds. > > > > Best regards, > > Tomasz Janeczko > > amibroker.com > > > > On 2010-08-26 00:41, Mubashar Virk wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I did not say you added them. I just said you may/might remove them. > >> > >> I understand what you mean "plain old FIR (finite impulse response) > >> can be proprietary", and I agree. > >> > >> However, there are lots of guys out there busy packaging the open > >> stuff into "neural-networks" and other number generators, and selling > >> them as there own. Fin-Ware is one of the guys. They sell FATL, > >> SATL, etc. and the numbers/indicators generator software. Hence, the > >> assumption that they are (or may be) proprietary. > >> > >> http://www.fin-ware.com/indicators.html > >> > >> Regards, > >> Mav > >> > >> PS: Is it DeMark who own a copyright on "OHLC". ;) > >> > >> > >> > >> On 8/26/2010 1:35 AM, Tomasz Janeczko wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> The original poster (soni67c) added them. > >>> > >>> With regards to 'proprietary' claim - could you explain? > >>> I don't think that a plain old FIR (finite impulse response) can be > >>> proprietary, > >>> and the formula in question is nothing more than basic FIR filter. > >>> > >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_impulse_response > >>> > >>> Z-transform (which is core idea behind > >>> digital filters like FIR) was introduced in 1952 (Ragazzini & Zadeh). > >>> Applications to sampled data systems are known from 1955 (Lago, G.V) > >>> 1958 (Jury) > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> Tomasz Janeczko > >>> amibroker.com > >>> > >>> On 2010-08-25 21:08, Mubashar Virk wrote: > >>> > >>>> Who posted them? > >>>> Fin-ware! > >>>> If not then TJ may have to take them out. These are proprietary > >>>> (and not for public disclosure), I think. > >>>> > >>>> On 8/25/2010 11:48 PM, soni67c wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Dear members, > >>>>> This is to notify that INDICATORS for FATL,SATL,RFTL,RSTL has been > >>>>> posted in AB Library . > >>>>> Thank you > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > > >
