On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 16:47, Thomas J. Stensås wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Wednesday 16 October 2002 15:19, Pete WullieW Ross wrote:
> > when I /whois a user, who is also logged into X (undernet) I get the
> > following
> >
> > 330 [London.UK.Eu.UnderNet.org] >WullieW< ziiL zolader :is logged in as
> >
> > which should actually be
> >
> > 330 [London.UK.Eu.UnderNet.org] >WullieW< ziiL :is logged in as zolader
> >
> > is there any way to fix this or is it an AmIRC bug?
> 
> This is neither an IRCd bug nor an AmIRC bug. Its just AmIRC that do not parse 
> the whois reply.
> 
> This was recently discussed on the Undernet Coder Com list which i suppose 
> have archives somewhere if you want to check it out.
> 
> Since its a numeric reply not listed in the IRC RFC its unlikely to ever be 
> supported directly by AmIRC and youd be better off writing a script or plugin 
> to parse this for you. I used a plugin to do the same for numerous server 
> replies which are not directy supported by AmIRC.

I just find it strange from what they do, All they have to do is move 2
variables.

Incorrect:
330 [London.UK.Eu.UnderNet.org] >WullieW< ziiL zolader :is logged in as

Correct:
330 [London.UK.Eu.UnderNet.org] >WullieW< ziiL :is logged in as zolader

Which would work with all damn clients.

-- 
Ian Kumlien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
-- File: signature.asc
-- Desc: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9rXyW7F3Euyc51N8RAj4tAJ9ioMwbpj/oHoDrMaAyDQEZWeBeDwCcDUKY
jinzfdFizolanFH8gBbbv8o=
=arLA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply via email to