On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 21:55, Daniel Westerberg wrote: > > Impossible to implent, read the rfc. > > What number?
ftp://ftp.ch.vapor.com/pub/vapor/amirc/info/rfc1459.txt > > One way of doing it would be to italic nick ppl who are known to be away > > but that would have to happen with a whois aswell. > > Oh, yes ofcourse. Other clients doesn't know if a user marked > himself as away and thus cannot be marked. What a pity :-( Some scripts does a ctcp away message while others does a prvmsg in the channel. All this is a major disturbance imho, It's much better to just do a whois when you need to know, or even better on ircd's that support it, do a /whois nick nick to get idle time. > Does the server know? > A hack could be made - some polling function, once every x minute.. > but that's rather ugly. Ofcource the server knows. And a hack would create a new server type. And amirc has very limited support for extensions as you might know. (You can't support every damn ircd out there) (Other than that read Jamies reply) -- Ian Kumlien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis -- -- File: signature.asc -- Desc: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+Dk027F3Euyc51N8RAioFAJ0S2kBcLPVwBUOcP5hztb7KTUo3dwCgsS2h UC47GZ8F0hQMRv8cepUwZ/I= =uxrk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
