Nice write up John!

Hmm, AM with reverse carrier control. Sounds interesting. That would look
something like an FM signal but with only one set of side bands.

Actually I have worked on some marine radios in the 70's that did do some
reverse carrier control. They were SSB radios with AM capability. You
could set the AM carrier level just about any level and when you modulated
it would adjust the carrier down to the proper level. It was hard to make
the radio sound bad on AM.

I don't remember how the ALC was detected for the AM mode or exactly how
the carrier level was controlled.

I don't know if it would gain much but it would eliminate a little band
noise when there was no modulation.

ASYMMETRICAL  AUDIO

The fact that most of our voices are not symmetrical can be an advantage
or disadvantage when modulating a radio. If the positive peaks are higher
than the negative peaks then you will not over modulate in the negative
direction while having positive peaks that exceed 100%.

However if you are trying to run the legal limit power then it can be a
disadvantage. Your average modulation level must be held low in order that
the positive peaks do not cause you to exceed the power limit. Flopping
the envelope over so that the negative peaks are higher than the positive
doesn't help either. In that case you will over modulate before your
average modulation level gets very high.

The solution may be to make the modulation "more symmetrical". There are
circuits consisting of several "all pass" filters that are supposed to do
that. By having more symmetrical audio to modulate the transmitter with
you will be able to obtain higher average levels of modulation without
exceeding the power limit and not over modulating in the negative
direction. It can also greatly reduce the need for large headroom in the
modulator.

Now add a little peak clipping and compression to the audio! You can
increase the average audio even more while still keeping within the power
limit and not over modulating in the negative direction. The broadcasters
do it every day and most sound great. Of course it can't be overdone or it
will not sound great anymore.

Average power is what does the work in the audio. Those high sharp peaks
are all but wasted. They add little to the sound of the signal. Especially
on a crowded band. It is those high peaks that keep you from attaining the
high average power that does most of the work.

In RADAR there is a very high peak power to average power ratio. The
reason being is that a certain pulse width and is needed to get the
resolution. With a given pulse width the only way to increase the average
power is to increase the peak power. Keeping the peak power the same and
increasing the pulse width raises the average power which increases the
range of the radar. But as the pulse width is increased the resolution
gets poorer. (ability to distinguish between two targets)
The point here is that it is average power that is important.

73
Gary  K4FMX




"John E. Coleman" wrote:

> I've be working on a document that might be of interest to many folks.
> With the help of K4KVY, WA3WDR, W5TOB and a month or two of night work
> I've come up with something good I hope.  Anyway here it is.
>
> http://www.qsl.net/wa5bxo/asyam/aam3.html
>
> I hope it is of some use to someone and encourages experimentation.
>
> John, WA5BXO
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMRadio mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio

Reply via email to