Paul, WA3GFZ, wrote:

> ... If one needs an 800 watt amplifier to run 
> 100 watts AM, then how does a Viking with 3 
> small 6146s run 125 watts AM?

It's due to the difference in efficiency between
a non-linear, plate-modulated, Class-C amplifier
and a linear, Class-AB2 amplifier.  A Class-C
amplifier can have up to 80% efficiency, so making
a 125-watt output would only require 156 watts of
plate power input and the final tubes would dissipate
31 watts.  Things are not that neat, so a typical
125-watt final runs a pair of 25-watt-plate-dissipation
6146's. (The Valiant is actually capable of 150+ watts
output).

However, Class-C amplifiers are NOT LINEAR.  Driving
one with a modulated RF signal results in a severely
distorted output signal that is useless for communications.
The extreme nonlinearity of a Class-C amplifier is
actually the reason it is able to achieve its high
efficiency.  

The reason the modulation is not distorted in a
modulated Class-C amplifier is that it is applied in 
series with the plate supply and actually varies the 
gain of the Class-C stage in a linear manner without 
relying on the amplification of the stage itself.

Amplifying an RF signal already modulated by the driver
(in the present case, the Ranger) requires a linear
amplifier.  Linear amplifiers have low efficiencies at
low signal levels and only achieve reasonable efficiency
on signal peaks.  Unfortunately, for AM, the carrier level
must be held at 1/4 the peak output power, so it is always
in the low-efficiency part of the linear-amplifier 
characteristic.  If the carrier amplitude is raised so that
it is in the high-efficiency part of the linear-amplifier
characteristic, positive modulation peaks will cause the
amplifier to saturate and extreme distortion will result.

Using linear amplifiers to amplify low-level-modulated 
signals is a viable mode of operation for radio services
that transmit on an intermittent basis at relatively low 
power levels (as amateur radio does).  However, in radio 
services such as broadcasting where the transmitter is on 
the air continuously (at high power levels), the electric 
power wastage becomes a significant expense factor.  And
the roughly 4X increase in power supplies and tubes required
presents an unjustifiable capital expense, even for amateur
stations.  The result is the almost universal adoption of
high-level modulated transmitters by both commercial and
amateur operators.  

The emergence of the requirement of linear amplification
for SSB over the past half century has resulted in the
creation of relatively cheap linear amplifiers for amateur 
radio use - so much so, in fact, that the economics have 
now swung back in favor of low-level modulation, or at least
placed it on par with high-level methods.  Price a modulation
transformer from Peter Dahl, or look at the nearly $4000 tag 
on the resurrected Globe King 500D.  That Ranger driving
a funky old Heath SB-220 begins to look pretty good.

Jim Bromley, K7JEB
Glendale, AZ


Reply via email to