It's normal for power to deflect downward on AM during modulation. You have to 
have a peak reading wattmeter to see the peaks..... Sounds like you have good 
modulation.
 
Cory/AD5QP

Tom Elmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am in the process of restoring a B&W 5100B transmitter and am using a
Coaxial Dynamics
wattmeter to measure power. I normally use this meter for CW & SSB and
noticed that when monitoring an AM carrier the meter deflects downward with
modulation. Is this a characteristic of this meter or maybe an issue with
the transmitter itself.

Thank You
Thomas Elmore KA1NVZ
Anchorage, Alaska

______________________________________________________________
AMRadio mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:[email protected]

                
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Mon Oct 11 10:33:44 2004
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from web81001.mail.yahoo.com (web81001.mail.yahoo.com
        [206.190.37.146])
        by mailman.qth.net (Postfix) with SMTP id D4505859D1A
        for <[email protected]>; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:33:41 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [12.14.128.194] by web81001.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
        Mon, 11 Oct 2004 07:24:39 PDT
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 07:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jim Candela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] B&W 5100B
To: Discussion of AM Radio <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: [email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Discussion of AM Radio <[email protected]>
List-Id: Discussion of AM Radio <amradio.mailman.qth.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/private/amradio>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:33:44 -0000


Cory,

   I once had a peak responding watt-meter, and you
are correct they are necessary to see the peaks. With
my ultra-modulated Viking I it read 100 watts carrier,
and 400 watts PEP at 100% tone modulation. It also
read 800 watts at 200% + modulation. If I switched to
average mode it read 150 watts at 100% tone
modulation.

   I currently use a Bird wattmeter without the peak
option. It too shows a 50% rise in power at 100% tone
modulation so long as my transmitter has no carrier
shift. A RF amp meter if in line with the RF output
should show a 22.5% rise at 100% tone modulation.

Regards,
Jim 

   

--- Cory Hine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It's normal for power to deflect downward on AM
> during modulation. You have to have a peak reading
> wattmeter to see the peaks..... Sounds like you have
> good modulation.
>  
> Cory/AD5QP
> 
> Tom Elmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am in the process of restoring a B&W 5100B
> transmitter and am using a
> Coaxial Dynamics
> wattmeter to measure power. I normally use this
> meter for CW & SSB and
> noticed that when monitoring an AM carrier the meter
> deflects downward with
> modulation. Is this a characteristic of this meter
> or maybe an issue with
> the transmitter itself.
> 
> Thank You
> Thomas Elmore KA1NVZ
> Anchorage, Alaska
> 
>
______________________________________________________________
> AMRadio mailing list
> Home:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
> 
>               
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
>
______________________________________________________________
> AMRadio mailing list
> Home:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
> 

Reply via email to