Patrick Jankowiak wrote: > > I find it all very entertaining. Indeed, the requirements of his > class of license do not keep the riffraff out. > > After what he does with a part of the spectrum that I would like > to use but for one requirement, I hope they throw the book at him. > > One FCC term I see is "apparent liability" If it is merely > apparent and the FCC does not accuse him of actual liability, why > would he be motivated to pay a dime? > > And does the FCC have the authority and the power to actually > "take" money from him? > > Just curious as to how these things play out. >
I used to share your curiosity. Lately I have given up caring about such things. They are sort of like watching a movie that has no plot but is in its fourth release. Regards, Frank Kamp
