Oh yeah... you are probably on that "special" list where they make sure you don't receive your QST or ARRL emails. That explains it then.
You're a hoot Brian! This stuff is so silly... I'm taking my foil hat off now and going back to thinking about radio. 73, Mark W1EOF > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Carling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 6:56 PM > To: W1EOF > Subject: RE: [AMRadio] recent comments on AM > > > They never asked me for my opinion. > > I was a member at the time. > > On 13 Jan 2006 at 18:30, W1EOF wrote: > > > > > Hi Brian - > > > > I don't understand how this is even a point of contention. > There are many > > different points available for contention or discussion in this > matter such > > as what they did after they got the results of the poll, etc. > > > > FACT: The ARRL polled their members. I am a member. I got > polled. I gave my > > opinion. All the other ARRL members I know were also polled too. I don't > > think it adds anything meaningful to the discussion when we get arguing > > about things which are indisputable facts. > > > > To deny the fact that they asked for, and got their members > opinions is just > > silly isn't it? > > > > 73, > > > > Mark W1EOF > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Brian Carling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 5:35 PM > > > To: Discussion of AM Radio > > > Subject: Re: [AMRadio] recent comments on AM > > > > > > > > > No, you let us know how they did such a great job of polling radio > > > amateurs instead of side stepping and claiming that they did... > > > > > > Where's the beef? > > > > > > On 13 Jan 2006 at 15:15, peter markavage wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for the English lesson. Let me know when you have more to > > > > contribute to my grammar. > > > > Pete, wa2cwa > > > > > > > > On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:05:13 -0500 "Brian Carling" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > writes: > > > > > On 13 Jan 2006 at 14:46, peter markavage wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > ARRL "request for comments to the draft proposal" is fully > > > > > documented. > > > > > > > > > > Fully? > > > > > > > > > > As compared to what? Half-documented? > > > > > How do you partially document something? > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > > > AMRadio mailing list > > > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > > > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > > > > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > > > AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net > > > > AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > > AMRadio mailing list > > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > > > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > > AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net > > > AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb > > > > > > > > > -- > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/228 - Release > Date: 1/12/06 > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/228 - Release Date: 1/12/06 > > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/228 - Release Date: 1/12/06 > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/228 - Release Date: 1/12/06
