I'll dance with him Mark.
I saw several ways that polling was requested: August 10, 2004: http://www.arrl.org/announce/bandwidth.html And last paragraph in this URL: Please read the synopsis of the petition, below, as well as the exact rules changes that will be proposed. If you have any questions or comments, please direct them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ARRL staff will do its best to answer your questions. Comments will be forwarded to your ARRL division director. Members are also welcome, as always, to comment directly to their own director using the email address listed on page 15 of any recent issue of QST. August 27, 2004 ARRL Letter: http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/04/0827/ ARRL Seeks Comment on Draft "Bandwidth" Petition See the last paragraph. I can probably quote a number of instances in QST Mag. from that time on where comments were requested. My own Director, through our Division Monthly Newsletter, also requested input and comments to the proposal several times. Pete, wa2cwa > > From: Brian Carling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 5:35 PM > > To: Discussion of AM Radio > > Subject: Re: [AMRadio] recent comments on AM > > > > > > No, you let us know how they did such a great job of polling > radio > > amateurs instead of side stepping and claiming that they did... > > > > Where's the beef? > > > > On 13 Jan 2006 at 15:15, peter markavage wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the English lesson. Let me know when you have more > to > > > contribute to my grammar. > > > Pete, wa2cwa > > > > > > On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:05:13 -0500 "Brian Carling" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > writes: > > > > On 13 Jan 2006 at 14:46, peter markavage wrote: > > > > > > > > > ARRL "request for comments to the draft proposal" is fully > > > > documented. > > > > > > > > Fully? > > > > > > > > As compared to what? Half-documented? > > > > How do you partially document something?
