I am sure there will be violators to this plan. The sad thing is people do
not respect others. However, all things considered, I believe the overall
effects of RM 11305 will be positive.
When not very many people make contact with stations as low as the example,
they will move to a more active part of the band. At least I hope, but the
fact remains, more space is needed for phone operation and the lower half of
80, 40,and 20 are under utilized.
73 Jim
W5JO
----- Original Message -----
From: "peter markavage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Web page appears in opposition to RM-11306
Maybe the CATT people can detail how they expect their proposal,
RM-11305, to work then. That's the only glue ("gentlemen's agreements")
that holds it together. Without it, it's total anarchy. i.e. any mode,
any bandwidth, anywhere.
Pete, wa2cwa
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:15:08 -0500 "Brian Carling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
In the last contest I listened to, there were non-U.S.
stations running SSB pile ups all the way down to 7002 KHz.
Yes boys, 7002! SO much for foretelling how the "gentlemen's
agreements" are going to work on all of the bands when the
ARRL gets their absurd bandwidth scheme in place!
"Gentlemen's agreements" only work among gentlemen.
