On 16 Jan 2006 at 19:25, peter markavage wrote:
> Maybe the CATT people can detail how they expect their proposal,
> RM-11305, to work then. That's the only glue ("gentlemen's agreements")
> that holds it together. Without it, it's total anarchy. i.e. any mode,
> any bandwidth, anywhere.
The exact same thing can be said of the ARRL proposal.
Thge only difference is that the ARRL proposal hampers everyone
with a lot more complicated rules and hampers the FCC with
enforcing something they don't have time to monitor.
