Let me add that a 6L6GC is rated at higher voltage and I suppose the 5881 military 6L6 is rated for more volts and would make a dandy substitue for the 1614.. 73 Mike
----- Original Message ----- From: "uvcm inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service'" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 3:37 PM Subject: RE: [AMRadio] 6L6 or 1614 > > > Both will work in a Johnson Ranger and no doubt the 1614 is the better > choice, but does anyone have facts as to the feasibility of using the > 6L6? I personally think the 6L6 works fine, but doesn't last long in > comparison. > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks, > Rick/K5IZ > > Try 6550 or KT88 used them for over 20 years never damaged or harmed any > component on a ranger 1 > Brad Kb7fqr > > ______________________________________________________________ > AMRadio mailing list > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > ______________________________________________________________ AMRadio mailing list List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:[email protected]
