Hi Drew,

My "work-around" (unless someone comes out with a finer-tuning HT between now 
and then!) is simple. I'm going to use a combination of the 5 kHz and 12.5 kHz 
tuning steps on my HT to program a set of memories that "Doppller tunes" the 
uplink in 2.5 kHz steps. That way, I'll be able to stay fairly close to the 
uplink throughout the pass. I'm confident the "one true rule" will still apply 
regardless of the receiver design. It has on AO-7 and VO-52 when I've worked 
passes using AFSK through an HT to send CW on those Mode B satellites. 

I'll use the same downlink in each memory because I've done just the opposite 
with our Mode J satellites - that is, use the same VHF uplink all the time and 
only Doppler-tune the downlink.

Please don't mistake my comments as any kind of criticism; they aren't intended 
that way at all. I'm looking forward to the challenge, and just hope others 
understand that one true rule and its impact on Mode B operations.

73 to all,

Tim - N3TL




________________________________
From: Andrew Glasbrenner <[email protected]>
To: Tim - N3TL <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; Michael Chen <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 1:20:17 PM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: HT supports full duplex satellite operation


> 
> I am thrilled with the news that AMSAT is moving forward with plans to build 
> and launch a 1U cub sat with a U/V (Mode B) transponder. However, 
> consistently hitting the uplink with HTs that tune no finer than 5 kHz will 
> be a challenge. I learned that last winter when the ISS repeater was active 
> in Mode B. When I used my FT-817 as a transmit radio and could use the main 
> tuning dial to infinitely fine-tune the uplink, I had much better - and more 
> consistent - success hitting the uplink than with my HT, which will only tune 
> in 5 kHz steps.
>  
It's all in the receiver design. The ISS D-700 isn't designed as a satellite 
receiver, and has a narrow front end.

Think of it this way. With 5 khz steps you are always within 2.5 khz of being 
"on frequency", right?

We operate the V/U FM satellites all the time without tuning the uplink, and 
that means we are up to 3 khz off, and everything works fine! So 2.5 khz will 
be a piece of cake too, plus folks will hear the 2m downlink much easier.

73, Drew KO4MA
_______________________________________________
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to