As I said, in the "goode olde dayes" we used 30 degree up tilt and it worked 
well for all passes including overhead passes.  Lessening the up tilt may 
increase the gain for the lower angle passes but will also decrease the gain on 
the higher angle passes.  So, it is a "trade off" no matter what you do!

Of course, back in the early 1970s we did not have computer simulations of 
antenna patterns, etc. readily available and experimentation showed that 30 
degrees worked the best.  

In terms of computers, if one had use of a computer what was generally done was 
to take the "keps" of a particular satellite (then primarily OSCAR VI and OSCAR 
VII) and make tables showing the azimuth and elevation for passes at various 
equator crossings giving a relative time for AOS and LOS.  You just added this 
time to the actual "clock" time and adjusted your rotor direction to correspond 
with this.

During the early 1970s, members of the Richardson Wireless Klub (K5RWK - 
Richardson, Texas) had access to main frame computers at Collins Radio, Texas 
Instruments, and Electrospace that were used to compute the information.  This 
information was compiled into a set of tables for OSCAR VI and OSCAR VII which 
was applicable to a radius of around 100 miles from the Dallas / Fort Worth 
area.

Using this rudimentary information I was able to acquire the 1st Satellite 1000 
award issued in the 5th call area and the 3rd award issued anywhere.  Also was 
able to acquire the achievement recognition number 32.  Many of today's 
operators are not aware of the efforts that it took "back then" to work the 
satellites.  Computer control of antennas, doppler, etc., make things much 
easier these days.

Glen, K9STH
AMSAT 239/LM 463

Website:  http://k9sth.com


--- On Tue, 4/12/11, Bob Bruninga <[email protected]> wrote:

Thanks for the confirmation.  Yes, elevation rotation is simply not needed at 
all for LEO spacecraft and modest beams.  A mild, fixed tilt modest beam is 
just perfect.
 
But, the "30 degree" angle myth is very pervasive throughout amsat, whereas, 
the optimum angle is more like 15 degrees.  
 
A 30 degree up-tilt gives up too much gain (-3 dB!) on the horizon where 
signals are weakest and where satellites spend most of their time, and puts the 
gain in an area of the sky where the satellite is already 6 dB stronger and is 
rarely there (giving you max beam gain where you need it least).

_______________________________________________
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to