Same here, no luck sending data. Bruce, do you maybe have a direct outside IP? I'm behind a NAT.
Wouter PA3WEG On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Mark L. Hammond <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, I still don't have it forwarding packets, according to their webpage. > > What is the delay from time of packets submitted to posted on the web? > Seconds/minutes/hours? > > Looking harder here, but it sure looks like Windows firewall is set to allow > JAVA to do it's thing... > > Bruce, how did you tell Win7 firewall to use JAVA? Did it pop up a security > window for you to enable traffice? I don't remember seeing that, but this > isn't the first JAVA thing I've done...Win7 firewall settings show java.exe > and javaw.exe enabled for both TCP and UDP traffic. > > Bleh. > > Mark N8MH > > > At 08:20 AM 2/16/2012 -0400, Bruce Robertson wrote: >>I sent packets yesterday with this email address, and then registered >>in the evening. This morning I see that it has retrospectively counted >>those packets to my new account! The only authorization I had to do >>with the software was to tell my Win7 firewall that java could connect >>to the internet on my behalf. >> >>So the system seems quite robust (not to mention pleasing to the eye). >> >>73, Bruce >>VE9QRP >> >> >> >>On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Mark L. Hammond >><[email protected]> wrote: >>> Okay, I had a brain failure here (least I think so...) >>> >>> I used my gmail address to register my station on the webpage, but used my >>> amsat address when the program started. I registered online weeks ago, so >>> when the registration page came up, I didn't even consider that it was >>> supposed to "match" to the website registration page. >>> >>> Will know tomorrow, but that has to be my problem. >>> >>> Makes sense...another "duh" moment :) >>> >>> 73, >>> >>> Mark N8MH >>> >>> At 05:13 PM 2/15/2012 -0500, Mark L. Hammond wrote: >>>>FYI: I have sent a couple hundred packets in, and they don't show... >>>> >>>>Mark N8MH >>>> >>>>On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Andy Kellner <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Looks like the Masat team updated / fixed their website, too. >>>>> Now when you go to the 'track our satellite' section, it actually shows >>>>> the position >>>>> of the satellite and - more importantly - the 'Packets Received' from >>>>> each registered >>>>> >>>>> Amateur station ! So now you can check if the packet upload is actually >>>>> working. >>>>> >>>>> http://cubesat.bme.hu/en/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Good stuff. Nicely Done, Masat team. >>>>> >>>>> Andreas - VK4HHH >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. >>>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! >>>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>-- >>>>Mark L. Hammond [N8MH] >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. >>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! >>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb >> >> >> >>-- >>http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb _______________________________________________ Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
