I haven't sent any by email, and I'm up over 300. I think they might literally mean 'includes', not 'comprises exclusively'.
I see that Mark's packets have made it on the map. 73, Bruce VE9QRP On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Andy Kellner <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > well maybe the automatic packet logging is not working after all (at least > for many people). > > I've just received another email from the team in hungary, and they told me > that the 'packets received' > > number on the google map includes all the packets sent to them VIA EMAIL > reports. > > Sure enough, I haven't sent my latest log file to them yet, and my packets > received counter > didn't change in the last 24 hours. > > So who knows - a bit frustrating not to know if the packet is actually logged > on their server or not. > > I guess if you want to make sure that your contribution actually makes it to > Hungary, send the log > file via email (instructions are on their website). > > Cheers, > Andreas - VK4HHH > > > > ________________________________ > From: Mark L. Hammond <[email protected]> > To: Bruce Robertson <[email protected]> > Cc: AMSAT-BB <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, 17 February 2012 12:08 AM > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Masat website update - 'packets received' now working. > > Indeed, Bruce--this software implementation for the telemetry is awesome! > > We'll get these issues sort out. The good news of course is that the > packets are being logged locally, so they can submitted manually via > email (which I haven't done yet...) > > I removed the current Win7 firewall exceptions for JAVA---no > warning/permissions window popped up! > Uninstalled/reinstalled Java--still no warning/permissions window > popped up; and no exceptions were added to the firewall during > re-install. > Manually added java.exe and javaw.exe to the firewall exceptions > (shows both TCP and UDP), and will test out later as the bird comes > into view... > > 73, > > Mark N8MH > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Bruce Robertson <[email protected]> wrote: >> I wonder if I am incorrect in generalizing my experience. On the >> website map, it seems too many people have '0' packets reported. And >> my latest pass (some good data at 4 deg. max el.!) isn't reported yet. >> >> When I first ran the application, windows firewall popped up and >> asked for me to permit java to access the internet. In my case, it was >> the first time I'd used this java install on this machine, so that is >> probably the difference. >> >> Despite this discussion, I think we'd all agree that this is a great >> package and it makes working with this new satellite very interesting. >> >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Mark L. Hammond <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Well, I still don't have it forwarding packets, according to their webpage. >>> >>> What is the delay from time of packets submitted to posted on the web? >>> Seconds/minutes/hours? >>> >>> Looking harder here, but it sure looks like Windows firewall is set to >>> allow JAVA to do it's thing... >>> >>> Bruce, how did you tell Win7 firewall to use JAVA? Did it pop up a >>> security window for you to enable traffice? I don't remember seeing that, >>> but this isn't the first JAVA thing I've done...Win7 firewall settings show >>> java.exe and javaw.exe enabled for both TCP and UDP traffic. >>> >>> Bleh. >>> >>> Mark N8MH >>> >>> >>> At 08:20 AM 2/16/2012 -0400, Bruce Robertson wrote: >>>>I sent packets yesterday with this email address, and then registered >>>>in the evening. This morning I see that it has retrospectively counted >>>>those packets to my new account! The only authorization I had to do >>>>with the software was to tell my Win7 firewall that java could connect >>>>to the internet on my behalf. >>>> >>>>So the system seems quite robust (not to mention pleasing to the eye). >>>> >>>>73, Bruce >>>>VE9QRP >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Mark L. Hammond >>>><[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Okay, I had a brain failure here (least I think so...) >>>>> >>>>> I used my gmail address to register my station on the webpage, but used >>>>> my amsat address when the program started. I registered online weeks >>>>> ago, so when the registration page came up, I didn't even consider that >>>>> it was supposed to "match" to the website registration page. >>>>> >>>>> Will know tomorrow, but that has to be my problem. >>>>> >>>>> Makes sense...another "duh" moment :) >>>>> >>>>> 73, >>>>> >>>>> Mark N8MH >>>>> >>>>> At 05:13 PM 2/15/2012 -0500, Mark L. Hammond wrote: >>>>>>FYI: I have sent a couple hundred packets in, and they don't show... >>>>>> >>>>>>Mark N8MH >>>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Andy Kellner <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> Looks like the Masat team updated / fixed their website, too. >>>>>>> Now when you go to the 'track our satellite' section, it actually shows >>>>>>> the position >>>>>>> of the satellite and - more importantly - the 'Packets Received' from >>>>>>> each registered >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Amateur station ! So now you can check if the packet upload is actually >>>>>>> working. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://cubesat.bme.hu/en/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Good stuff. Nicely Done, Masat team. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Andreas - VK4HHH >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. >>>>>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite >>>>>>> program! >>>>>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>-- >>>>>>Mark L. Hammond [N8MH] >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. >>>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! >>>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>-- >>>>http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com > > > > -- > Mark L. Hammond [N8MH] > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > _______________________________________________ > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb -- http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
