Joe -

I did the implementation described in a professional flight dynamics software 
program.  The convention (as specified by the gov't) is to have an array of 360 
azimuthal "obscura" elevations.  The first entry defines the minimum elevation 
for 0 to 1 deg in azimuth, the second entry defines the minimum elevation for 1 
to 2 deg in azimuth, up to the 360th entry defining 359 to 0/360 deg in 
azimuth.  The 1-deg wide azimuthal increments are narrow enough that you get an 
excellent obscura picture even with the elevations being a step function.  It 
provides a great way to anticipate when obstructions may interfere with an RF 
or visible LOS.

73, Ken N2WWD

Sent from my iPad



On Mar 26, 2013, at 2:34 PM, Joseph Armbruster <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Joe,
> 
> What tracking program is that?
> 
> I was thinking of making my satellite icons configurable.  This way the 
> satellite would look like the actual satellite.  Even better, I could store 
> collada models for them and load them in place of the icon.  Oh la la, that's 
> an idea.
> 
> Joseph Armbruster
> 
> 
> On Mar 26, 2013, at 7:58 AM, Joe Fitzgerald wrote:
> 
>> On 3/25/2013 6:42 PM, Ken Ernandes wrote:
>>> 2.  If you decide to give the users the ability to input their location, 
>>> them the option to provide either a single minimum elevation angle or a 
>>> local map -- i.e., 360 individual minimum elevations as a function of 
>>> Azimuth.  It's much easier to project this and the user is generally 
>>> interested in an unobstructed LOS with respect to his/her location.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> It's not the best resolution but in the image below, you can see how there 
>> are "cut outs" in the circles surrounding NASA's ground stations - the 
>> software has clearly implemented the idea Ken outlined above.  For example, 
>> there is apparently some obstruction to the south east of the Hawaiian 
>> tracking station.  If the sub-satelite point is inside the white line it's 
>> AOS.  The surface of the earth visible to the shuttle, on the other hand, is 
>> simply a red circle, just faintly visible in this image.
>> 
>> http://vault.newsfromspace.com/missions/sts114/STS114_land-5.jpg
>> 
>> -Joe KM1P
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

_______________________________________________
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to