Yes, It could work as long as software for doppler control (eg SatPc32) can invoke the smaller frequency changes which it actually can (see my other note on the IC-9100). So you would use the built-in DSTAR module for uplink or downlink and the 9600 packet mode with a GMSK node adapter for the other in a full duple radio like the IC-9100. Or you use two radios in 9600 packet mode with 2 node adapters for uplink and downlink as long as they are supported via doppler software and small frequency steps.
Stefan On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:05 AM, K2AK - Jeff <[email protected]> wrote: > Great point! > > Hi Angelo, > > Jeff - K2AK > (X-K7WIN) > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Angelo Glorioso > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 8:57 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: D STAR > > When GO32 was running, we were able to send and receive data at 9600 bps. > DSTAR voice. on 444 is 2400bps and data is 4800bps gsm if I am correct. > > So, why would it not work via satellite other than having to get 5 kc > steps > reduced to 1k or less. > > 73 de Angelo > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gordon JC Pearce" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 9:22 AM > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: D STAR > > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 08:46:24AM -0600, damon runion wrote: > >> Well back in the days of AM and when SSB came out it was the same > >> thinking then BUT what has happened to AM . Same thing with DSTAR it > >> is growing and will grow . Thats what makes ham radio so much fun, > >> there is something for everyone > >> 73,s Damon > > > > But the difference there is that *anyone* can make an SSB rig. Only one > > manufacturer is allowed to make AMBE codecs, and they will only sell to a > > handful of approved radio manufacturers. > > > > It is illegal to make your own DStar radio, without buying the AMBE codec > > from DVSI. That sort of thing has no place in amateur radio. > > > > -- > > Gordonjcp MM0YEQ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite > program! > > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > _______________________________________________ Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
