-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 What about a tarball -src and a tarball -bin ... then there is no doubt And anyway ... if it is written in the README that they have to compile or not ... that should be enough
in my opinion GrdScarabe Youness Alaoui wrote: > You're sure ? > I though that I should add the -src so people would know it's a source > package and they need to compile it... and leave the binaries easily > recognizable... > another poll? :D lol > anyways, what do others think ? > by the way, I updated the windows installer... I had a little problem > with the older installer... > you can retry IF you tried it before... > > KaKaRoTo > > On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 20:04:52 -0500, Karol Krizka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wednesday 07 December 2005 16:42, Youness Alaoui wrote: >> >>> Yeah, I just don't know.. I think it should be rebuilt, that's just the >>> way it should be... >>> Anyways, I've created the installers, I'd like to have feedback >>> about them >>> because I really am not sure.... >>> after all, I don't like bitrock installer that much :D they are in an >>> early state, that's all, they no SO MUCH more options and a better >>> way for >>> manipulating the installer... >>> >>> you'll find all the packages I have so far in >>> http://kakaroto.homelinux.net/amsn >>> Can you all test please the package of your system ? >>> I need feedback ASAP. >>> >> I just have a comment on the bz2 and gz packages. Could we rename them to >> amsn-0.95.tar.gz? I just think that's a mroe standard way. >> >>> Thanks, >>> KaKaRoTo >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 05:16:37 -0500, Arieh Schneier >>> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > 13 days isn't so old? The only changes since then are the bug for >>> X isn't >>> > it? So that shouldn't make any difference for the windows build? >>> > >>> > If you want I can recompile it, but I can't do it till tomorrow. >>> > >>> > Lio. >>> > >>> > ----- Original Message ----- >>> > From: "Youness Alaoui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > To: <[email protected]> >>> > Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 6:34 AM >>> > Subject: Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.95 taged and released >>> > >>> > >>> > Last commit date for the dll is a bit old, can you please >>> recompile and >>> > send me ? >>> > Phil, if you're also using an rpm system, can you create a .rpm >>> and send >>> > it to me, I don't want to put my own rpm created on a debian system.. >>> > Also, question, does your rpm work on all rpm systems ? FC, redhat, >>> > mandrake, whatever else ? >>> > >>> > thx >>> > KaKaRoTo >>> > >>> > On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:25:26 -0500, Le Philousophe - Phil >>> > >>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >> There is a DLL in the CVS !! >>> >> utils/TkCximage/TkCximage.dll >>> >> Phil >>> >> >>> >> Le Mardi 6 Décembre 2005 20:12, Boris Faure (billiob) a écrit : >>> >>> 2005/12/6, Karol Krizka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>> > On Monday 05 December 2005 18:46, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer wrote: >>> >>> > > To get the official 0.95 aMSN (to create your packages) >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > cvs export -rRelease-0_95 -d export msn >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > So now, can someone contact the packagers? >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Can I create the tar.gz package? Portage system uses the >>> tarball to >>> >>> > install the package and since I want to create the ebuild now I'll >>> >>> >>> >>> need >>> >>> >>> >>> > it. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > -- >>> >>> > Karol Krizka >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>> >>> >>> Karol, if you a want a beta tester for your ebuild, ask me. (and if >>> >>> you need help, i've already a cvs-ebuild for amsn). You should add >>> >>> some USE flags like v4l. >>> >>> >>> >>> By the way, i just have to use windows, and there's no dll for >>> >>> tkcximage in the current cvs. I hope it's normal, but i can't >>> test :( >>> >>> >>> >>> Greets >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Boris FAURE (billiob) >>> >>> mail, msn : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> No trees were killed in the sending of this message. >>> >>> However, a large number of electrons were terribly >>> >>> agitated. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep >>> through log >>> >>> files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that >>> >>> makes >>> >>> searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD >>> SPLUNK! >>> >>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=Click >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Amsn-devel mailing list >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel >>> >> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep >>> through log >>> >> files >>> >> for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes >>> >> searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD >>> SPLUNK! >>> >> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Amsn-devel mailing list >>> >> [email protected] >>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel >> >> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDl6FTPmfsnt4Id3wRAi/YAKCA8uDPPj5EnjX05g2Ad3KkA+WJhwCdGLQr KXl5W4he594WMck5Yst5fUc= =z1Ls -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click _______________________________________________ Amsn-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
