Hi, I wonder why the 'no ng' of the capture extension is there. Is it still useful, or can it be dropped?
The reason why I ask is: if new procs or new arguments to existing procs get added to the Capture API, and those new features are used from TCL, and the API change is not implemented in capture-nong, then we have a TK error if we compiled without ng! So if we keep the 'no ng' version, we will need to implement any new API feature twice! Harry ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Amsn-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
