follow up time :
just to be sure you noticed, there is no more nong support in amsn, as you
requested!
thanks
KKRT
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:16:08 -0500, Harry Vennik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
I wonder why the 'no ng' of the capture extension is there.
Is it still useful, or can it be dropped?
The reason why I ask is: if new procs or new arguments to existing procs
get
added to the Capture API, and those new features are used from TCL, and
the
API change is not implemented in capture-nong, then we have a TK error
if we
compiled without ng! So if we keep the 'no ng' version, we will need to
implement any new API feature twice!
Harry
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Amsn-devel mailing list
Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
--
KaKaRoTo
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Amsn-devel mailing list
Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
