On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Youness Alaoui wrote: > why name subject 'proxy' ??
because i am tiiiiiiiiiiired :) ok ppl, false alarm! > anyways, the nat detection is very important IMHO, not only do we get > thousands of reports about "ouhh, it says I'm firewalled", but also, in > the case of an FT, if both use amsn, both are not firewalled but both > amsns think they are firewalled, they will use the SB, simply because > FTs don't work the same as webcams... yeah but it will work, even if it's slow! > disassembling ink will take years, same for audio clips and 'whatever > fancy M$ thing', while nat detection is not that difficult maybe a > simple sniff will give us a very simple solution, maybe not... maybe > we'll need the hostname of the port checker and for that, we'll just > have to disassemble and look for 'nat' in the strings the executable > contains.. maybe there's a proprietary hash that needs to be RE-ed and > in that case, it will take too long and at that point it's not necessary > anymore, we'll have to find another server than MS servers... but I > still think it's worth it to spend some time on this issue... yeah, if you put it this way :) if we can find it without RE-ing, sure! now who's going to sniff M$N? :P ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
