btw, this whole thread wasn't about what to put in the new wiki, it was  
about changing links to the old wiki so we can put this new wiki as  
amsn.sf.net/wiki instead of amsn.sf.net/userwiki and have the old wiki in  
amsn.sf.net/devwiki
who's taking care of changing those links ?

KKRT


On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 04:03:33 -0400, NoWhereMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
wrote:

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Youness Alaoui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>> On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 01:41:53 -0400, NoWhereMan  
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>
>>> I used apt as an example because
>>> a) I'm good with Ubuntu :P
>>> b) on another distro that would have been quite the same, excepted
>>> gentoo, I
>>> think; but if you can run Gentoo, then you can figure it out yourself  
>>> ;)
>>>
>>
>> no judgement here, I also use apt :P
>
> sure, sure, this answer was for Max
>
>>> That's not a bad idea, but I wouldn't want that modularization became
>>> fragmentation.
>>
>> I agree with you, I'm also worried about fragmentation, which is why we
>> need to find the best balance, fragmentation vs. modularity, try to do
>> something in the middle.
>
> Ok :)
>
>> me too, on the forums for example, on irc, on msn.. but for a 'guide',  
>> it
>> should stay official/professional! sometimes small things could still be
>> allowed to make the article less boring, but it shouldn't be too much ;)
>
> I'll force myself being less stupid :D (that'll be hard)
>
>>> Actually the Dev_Packages (typo: capital P, fixed) link tells him how  
>>> to
>>> install *build dependencies* for tcl/tk8.4
>>> but you're right I was not clear, there
>>>
>
>> no, what I meant is that there are no build dependencies!!! so no need  
>> to
>> talk about build-dep, it only makes the whole thing more complicated..
>> there is no dependency (apart from libc and xlibs as mentioned below,  
>> but
>> those should be on any system!!! )
>
> oh. I don't know, I did that long ago, so I don't remember what had been
> installed for Ubuntu (standard installation is quite light, there's not  
> even
> gcc, you know...)
>
>>> is xft-dev required? I'm not sure...
>> no idea, ask in #tcl channel maybe...
>
> stupid question; I already got the answer myself and forgot to remove it
> form the mail :P
> it's needed.
>
> bye
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amsn-devel mailing list
> Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel



-- 
KaKaRoTo


_______________________________________________
Amsn-devel mailing list
Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel

Reply via email to