On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:01, Arantes <arantes...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello guys, > Just wanted to say ... I really don't like this. Not because of the use of > DBUS, or the multiprocess or not, but because i really think that if we do > that, aMSN won't be aMSN no more. It would just be another multi protocol > client, like there are tons of. I really think aMSN should stay a msn-only > client, that's how it can be the best at it.
Of course aMSN2 should stay focused on msn. But the only need of multi protocol i have is to be able to chat with my parents and my sister and have audio/video conversations with them since they use gchat. That's all i need and i think that's all i'll ever try/work on. I'll still use irssi for irc for example. As Youness stated, it's not really a big change. -- Boris 'billiob' Faure ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d _______________________________________________ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
