> I don't see why. Log files compress *very* nicely (typically 95%-98%
> compression ratios at maximum compression), and Analog has no problem with
> compressed log files. Disk space is cheap nowadays, so why would keeping
> six years of log files be crazy? I have Analog running on three years'
> worth, and I'm sure there's people on this list who've got that beat.
Quite true, quite true, they do, but that's simply don't an option I'm
looking at in this case. Yes, we have more than enough space in there to
handle that. What I don't want to do is have 120 virtual domains, with 3
years of log files each, being reanalyzed every week.
I don't care how good Analog is - that's just not a server load, or a
process I would like to see happening. Nothing against Analog, of course.
So, scratch the idea of keeping the log files. Do I have any other option?
Kevin Hemenway
-- -----------------------------------------------------------------
Total Net NH, LLC EMAIL: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
15 Pleasant St., Suite 11 WEBSITE: <http://www.totalnetnh.net/>
Concord, NH 03301 PHONE: (603) 225-8422
--------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
List archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/analog-help@lists.isite.net/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
