Peter Love wrote:
> > I'm not really sure how to distinguish the two cases though. It's not been a
> > problem before I introduced regexps, because commas don't normally occur in
> > names.
>
> In this case I can split it into 5 separate REGEXPs, but others might
> come up in the future. In the future, could the whole REGEXP be
> enclosed in quotes or something like that?
How about enclosing it in slashes, a la` Perl. Instead of
USERINCLUDE REGEXP:sret\d,pklove
use
USERINCLUDE /sret\d/,/pklove/
Jeremy Wadsack
Wadsack-Allen Digital Group
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
List archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
