William Bunbury wrote:
> I do have referrer data in the log files, and I am getting Referrer &
> Referring Site info.
>
> Example logfile entry:
> 130.101.2.98 - - [19/Nov/2000:17:47:24 -0500] "GET
> /About/History1700to1800.html HTTP/1.1" 200 94160
> "<http://www.google.com/search?q=Sir+Joshua+Reynolds%3A+Blenheim++Marlboroug
> h+family+portraits&btnG=Google+Search&hl=en&lr=&safe=off>" "Mozilla/4.0
> (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98)"
>
> Example from Referrer Report:
> <http://www.google.com/search?q=Sir+Joshua+Reynolds:+Blenheim++Marlborough+f
> amily+portraits&btnG=Google+Search&hl=en&lr=&safe=off>
>
> So that seems perfect.
No, because Analog isn't recognizing the Referrers properly. The <> around the
link are not standard, so you'll have to use a custom LOGFORMAT command to parse
them out. Taking the standard "Combined" format from docs/logfmt.html and adding
the brackets gives:
LOGFORMAT (%S %j %u [%d/%M/%Y:%h:%n:%j] "%j%w%r%wHTTP%j" %c %b "<%f>" "%B")
LOGFORMAT (%S %j %u [%d/%M/%Y:%h:%n:%j] "%j%w%r" %c %b "<%f>" "%B")
Try that (one line per command) and you should get better results.
Jeremy Wadsack
Wadsack-Allen Digital Group
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
List archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
