No I do not have any exclude filters.  When I run analog I don't I get the 
following error:

"Warning C: In File Type Report, P, p, Q and q
  not allowed in COLS: ignoring them"

"Warning L: logfiles
  /backup/logs/web2001/bpb/access_log.2001050401.gz and
  /backup/logs/web2001/bpb/access_log.20010505.gz overlap: possible double
  counting"

Do you think it is because the errors above?  The reason for double counting 
is because the two logs files are from different servers. The data is 
different and analog raises the error if the time is the same on different 
records.  Correct me if I am wrong. 

Thanks for your help.

On Wednesday 16 May 2001 06:38, you wrote:
> do you have any exclude filters in place? that could account for the
> difference.
>
> also, images and other non-page files produce 200s which would show up with
> the gawk. not sure if those show up on analog too.
>
> > Hi I am looking at the server status report and I see the
> > following stats for
> > status report in analog.
> >
> > 91584          200 OK
> > 670    206 Partial content
> > 21             301 Document moved permanently
> > 179            302 Document found elsewhere
> > 11446      304 Not modified since last retrieval
> > 10           400 Bad request
> > 2379          403 Access forbidden
> > 1003          404 Document not found
> > 163           500 Internal server error
> > 14            502 Error at upstream server
> > 51            503 Service temporarily unavailable
> > 64            504 Gateway timeout
> >
> >
> > For comparison purpose, I tried the following on the command
> > line and got the
> > following results.  Everything seems okay, however the
> > analog's number for
> > 200 is 91,584 and commandline is 95,563.
> >
> > gawk '{print $8}' access_log* | sort | uniq -c
> > 1
> > 2   "-"
> > 1   '.gif
> > 1   /issues/2001-05-03/feature.html/page1.html
> > 95563       200
> > 673         206
> > 21  301
> > 182         302
> > 1875        304
> > 10  400
> > 2447        403
> > 1065        404
> > 167         500
> > 14  502
> > 52  503
> > 64  504
> > 5   FALSE
> > 4   TRUE
> >
> > Am I doing the right comparison?
> > I read in the docs what are considered successful requests.
> > All other numbers are pretty close so why is status 200 so far apart?
> >
> > Thanks for you help.
> >
> > +-------------------------------------------------------------
> > -----------
> >
> > |  This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
> > |  mailing list, go to
> > |    http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html
> > |
> > |  List archives are available at
> > |    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> > |    http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/
> > |    http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7
> >
> > +-------------------------------------------------------------
> > -----------
>
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> |  This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
> |  mailing list, go to
> |    http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html
> |
> |  List archives are available at
> |    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> |    http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/
> |    http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7
>
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
|  mailing list, go to
|    http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html
|
|  List archives are available at
|    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
|    http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/
|    http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7
+------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to