I think the some lines in the files were corrupt.  I checked the columns for 
a few sample lines and came to that conclusion. 

Thanks
Ahsan

On Saturday 19 May 2001 06:35, you wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2001, Ahsan Imam wrote:
> > For comparison purpose, I tried the following on the command line and got
> > the following results.  Everything seems okay, however the analog's
> > number for 200 is 91,584 and commandline is 95,563.
>
> I'm not sure this ever got solved, and I don't know the answer either. :)
> All I can suggest is to try it on progressively shorter logfiles until you
> can find the discrepancy.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
|  mailing list, go to
|    http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html
|
|  List archives are available at
|    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
|    http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/
|    http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7
+------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to