On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Aengus wrote: > > The "invalid" line had a * under REF, so, even though the line matched > the first LOGFORMAT above, for some reason Analog was trying to evaluate > it as a different format. I would have thought that you had the > LOGFORMATs in the right order, but I haven't looked at the code, so I'm > not entirely sure in what order they are evaluated. Perhaps reversing > the order might make a difference? >
The first one is tried first. -- Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/ "This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01 +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this | mailing list, go to | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | List archives are available at | http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/ | http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7 +------------------------------------------------------------------------
