Jean-Christian Imbeault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes I did put LOGFORMAT before LOGFILE. Though I run analog from the > command line like this: > > #analog ./access.log > > So I would think that the cfg file's LOGFILE directive is ignored?
More to the point, the LOGFORMAT directives are ignored. You need DEFAULTLOGFORMAT instead. > Also am I right in thinking that the order of the various LOGFORMAT > directives is unimportant? > > I'm still confused as to why analog refuses to parse this log file in > it's entirety but will happily parse the lines if spurts out as being > "invalid". >From what you say above, it's because Analog didn't know that you intended those LOGFORMATs to apply to that particular LOGFILE. Aengus +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this | mailing list, go to | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | List archives are available at | http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/ | http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7 +------------------------------------------------------------------------
