My referrer report currently lists things like this: 150 http://www.classic.winamp.com/plugins/detail.html 150 http://www.classic.winamp.com/plugins/detail.html?componentId=122606
That's because the winamp site uses a database, rather than hierarchical directories, to manage its files. That's why everything there is shown as arguments rather than as files/directories. But morally speaking, it should behave like a directory/filename. It shouldn't be indented and duplicated. It should be just as though it was http://www.../plugins/detail.html/componentId=122606 Is there any way to tell Analog about referrer sites which uses questionmarks instead of forwardslashes to organise their content, so as to get a more uniform Referrer report? -- Lucian +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | Digest version: http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help-digest/ | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------
