Is there any way I can get analog to differentiate traffic based on which file the data is in? Our system has four parallel servers and I create the following reports every day: - one individual report for each of the four servers - an overall report for all traffic For the overall report I concatenate the four files into one and run analog.
What I'd like to be able to do in the overall report (the concatenated one) is offer additional information on load balancing, that is report on the amount of traffic that was handled by each of the four legs. For example: Total Requests handled = 100,000 Requests handled by AP3 = 40,000 Requests handled by AP4 = 20,000 Requests handled by AP5 = 20,000 Requests handled by AP6 = 20,000 Even better would be if it were broken down by request type, but overall requests would be sufficient. I thought I could do this with the virtual domain report but I can't seem to get it to work. What I've done is this: I specified the following for LOGFILE LOGFILE "D:\analog\temp\AP3\SUM\sum.log" http://www.ap3.com LOGFILE "D:\analog\temp\AP4\SUM\sum.log" http://www.ap4.com LOGFILE "D:\analog\temp\AP5\SUM\sum.log" http://www.ap5.com LOGFILE "D:\analog\temp\AP6\SUM\sum.log" http://www.ap6.com where "www.apX.com" is an artifical way of making the requests from each server look different. When I run analog I get this error: d:\analog\analog.exe: Warning L: logfiles D:\analog\temp\AP3\SUM\sum.log and D:\analog\temp\AP4\SUM\sum.log overlap: possible double counting *** And the counts are all off (they're way too high)*** Just as a check, if I recombine the 4 files back into one and change LOGFILE back: LOGFILE "D:\analog\temp\total.log" OR if I remove the virtual host: LOGFILE "D:\analog\temp\AP3\SUM\sum.log" LOGFILE "D:\analog\temp\AP4\SUM\sum.log" LOGFILE "D:\analog\temp\AP5\SUM\sum.log" LOGFILE "D:\analog\temp\AP6\SUM\sum.log" the counts are correct again. But in both cases, I never get a correct "virtual domain report". All I can come up with to get this to work is used sed to prepend the IP of each of the servers to the front of the line and then define a custom LOGFORMAT to include this new field. But since I already have each servers' log file separated, this seems needless. Anyone have any ideas? I should add that analog is an extremely awesome product BTW! Thanks, --Paul __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------
