Paul Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Jeremy, > > Thanks for the tutorial. However, I must take issue since I think > that IS a named entity in both the HTML 4.0 and XHTML 1.0 > standards. I can certainly validate it via the usual suspects, > without resorting to the numeric entity and using XHTML 1.0 > Transitional. > > However, I WAS also wondering whether this might work better with a > more forgiving browser, such as IE. Also I was wondering whether > somewhere this is all being delivered as application/xhtml+xml > instead of text/xml and maybe this accounts for something?
Which is why it's important to know who or what is generating the actual error message. If the data that is received at the client includes the error text, then the problem is occurring on the web server. If the browser is generating the error message, and a different browser doesn't, then you're into angels on a pinhead territory. Aengus +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------
